首页> 外文OA文献 >Tarp populizmo ir poparcheologijos: populiarioji kultūra šiuolaikinio Lietuvos teatro scenoje
【2h】

Tarp populizmo ir poparcheologijos: populiarioji kultūra šiuolaikinio Lietuvos teatro scenoje

机译:在民粹主义与人民考古学之间:当代立陶宛戏剧舞台上的大众文化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There has been a proliferation of studies on popular culture (or vacillating terms such as massculture, culture for the masses, culture industry, media culture) that interpret/investigate the popular as cultural construction – something ‘staged’ rather than ‘natural’ or ‘given’. According to Nestor Garcia Canclini, three currents play the major role in this ‘theatricalization’ of the popular: folklore (as invented traditions), the culture industry, and political populism. Performance can play an important part in all three spheres; however, the main question is how it deals with the popular – by reconstructing and multiplying its images, narratives and identities, by appropriating or by challenging and deconstructing them. If we understand various forms of popular culture as “imaginary stagings of the social,” theatre which forms a tense, interrogative relationship with the popular can become the platform for investigation of the means by which our perception of reality is constructed and new models of identification are produced. Furthermore, there are quite a number of examples in contemporary Lithuanian theatre where combining and contrasting the elements of popular culture / dramatic discourse / personal narratives produce a multiple network of representations that accurately reveal the hidden power struggles of contemporary society as well as various mechanisms of manipulation. On the other hand, contemporary theatre can very easily become part of the popular culture by choosing to mirror its language and to comply with the rules of popularity. In this paper, the author examines the ways in which the popular culture has been represented (re-contextualization, ironic interpretation, critical deconstruction, or mimetic mirroring) on the stage of post-Soviet Lithuanian theatre, at the same time addressing the larger issues about the political and social implications of these particular stagings of the popular.
机译:流行文化(或诸如大众文化,大众文化,文化产业,媒体文化之类的贬义词)的研究激增,将流行解释或调查为文化建构,这是“上演的”而不是“自然的”或“给定的。内斯特·加西亚·坎克利尼(Nestor Garcia Canclini)认为,在民众的“戏剧化”中,三种潮流起着主要作用:民俗(作为传统发明),文化产业和政治民粹主义。绩效可以在所有三个领域发挥重要作用。然而,主要的问题是它如何与大众打交道–通过重建和扩大其形象,叙述和身份,通过挪用或挑战和解构它们。如果我们将各种形式的大众文化理解为“社会的想象的舞台”,那么与大众形成紧张,质疑性关系的剧院就可以成为研究建构我们对现实的理解和新的认同模式的平台。被生产。此外,在当代立陶宛剧院中,有很多例子,它们将流行文化/戏剧性话语/个人叙事的元素进行组合和对比,形成了一个多元化的表征网络,可以准确地揭示当代社会的隐性权力斗争以及各种机制。操纵。另一方面,通过选择模仿其语言并遵守流行规则,当代戏剧很容易成为流行文化的一部分。在本文中,作者研究了在后苏联立陶宛剧院舞台上代表大众文化的方式(重新语境化,讽刺性解释,批判性解构或模仿镜像),同时着眼于更大的问题这些特定阶段的民众对政治和社会的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Staniškytė, Jurgita;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号